Since 1902, marketers have relied on the Attention-Interest-Desire-Action (AIDA) Model developed by Elias St. Elmo Lewis to understand how consumers learn about and take actions related to brands.
The growing influence of the consumer’s voice in an always-on digital environment, however, has made obsolete many of the AIDA Model assumptions that underlie the funnel-based view of how consumers and brands engage with each other. The antiquated assumptions include:
Engagement is a linear process with a distinct beginning and end.
Communications are initiated and controlled by the brand.
The only communications that influence the purchase are between the consumer and the brand.
If consumer engagement can no longer be explained by a brand-managed funnel, what construct accurately depicts the way that engagement occurs? And what types of engagement have the biggest impact on customer lifetime value? My colleagues and I at Northwestern University’s Spiegel Research Center set out to answer those questions, and what we found has powerful implications for content marketers.
Watch as Tom discusses the findings of the research that led to the development of the Consumer Engagement Engine:
Introducing the Consumer Engagement Engine
Our research showed us that engagement in today’s digital communications ecosystem works not like a funnel but like an engine where brands and consumers are synergistically interacting with each other in new ways that can have a powerful impact on customer value.
While the Consumer Engagement Engine differs from the traditional funnel in many ways, these five characteristics are particularly important to content marketers looking to engage with consumers in relevant and valuable ways:
1. The engine is elegant
It’s made of five interlocking components: Brand actions, customer motivations, purchase behaviors, brand consumption, and brand dialogue behaviors. Consumers are constantly being influenced by messages from friends, social networks, strangers, the media, and intermediaries – messages that are sent and delivered across numerous platforms and devices.
2. There is no on/off switch
Unlike the funnel, which represents engagement as a linear process with a beginning and an end, the engine reflects the always-on state of engagement. Unlike the funnel’s “end,” often the purchase is the catalyst for the start of new and enhanced levels of engagement. The engagement engine is in perpetual motion.
3. Brand actions are just one of the cogs
The brand no longer controls when and how consumer engagement occurs. Today, customers or other actors are just as likely as marketers to initiate brand-related communication. Brands are moving from being broadcasters to being listener-responders.
4. Users of the brand are vital
Buyers’ brand consumption experiences – good or bad – are fuel for sharing. The good ones positively power the engine.
5. Brand dialogue behavior is the biggest cog
Our research found that non-purchase behaviors – brand dialogue behaviors (BDB) – have the greatest impact on future engagement. We uncovered powerful insights about how BDBs are driving customer lifetime value. Now, we examine BDBs and their role in driving value.
Understanding and ranking brand dialogue behaviors
Our research found that the types of engagement that frequently had the greatest impact on consumers were brand dialogue behaviors, which can involve consumers, other purchasers, non-purchasers, and the brand itself.
The research also found that these BDBs currently lack a categorization, taxonomy, or ranking according to the value they create for the brand. Content marketers need to better understand the opportunity presented by BDBs, as well as the brand’s role in BDBs – a role that involves enhancing the customer experience and/or listening and responding to the engagements.
BDBs can be categorized into three distinct types, all of which have an increasing degree of interactivity and value for the brand:
Observation – “Lean-back” behavior where the consumer takes a passive role, such as reading a tweet or looking at a retargeting ad
Participation – Behavior where the consumer takes an active role in engaging with the content, such as retweeting or looking up a consumer review of a product
Co-creation – Behavior where the consumer creates original content that is relevant to the brand, such as participating in a contest to create a new flavor of potato chips, writing a blog post, or voting in a reality TV show
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: 4 Tools to Create Interactive Content in Minutes
Our research found that as consumers engage more actively and in ways that involve relevant interaction with the brand, there is a strong correlation to increasing levels of customer lifetime value.
Revving the engine
Here are five things that you can do to engage with customers in ways that drive customer lifetime value in today’s digital ecosystem:
Adopt the engine – Use the engine framework to better engage and drive value for your brand.
Map your engagement – Identify where your engagement efforts lie on the brand dialogue behavior hierarchy.
Invest in your customers – Invest heavily in customer experiences and help this audience become your advertisers.
Drive relevant engagement only – Stimulate only the types of engagement that create a relevant connection to the brand.
Listen and respond – Use social media to be a responder, not just a broadcaster.
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: Onward & Upward: Go Behind the Scenes of Priceline’s Social Media
As content marketers continue to adapt to the opportunities and challenges presented by today’s rapidly evolving communications landscape, we believe the Consumer Engagement Engine will be a valuable tool for helping marketers engage with existing customers, prospects, intermediaries, and other actors in ways that create value for the brand.
Stay updated on the latest research and insight from academic and industry experts. Subscribe to the daily or weekly CMI blog.
Cover by Viktor Hanacek, picjumbo, via pixaby.com
Comments